It doesn't get more obvious than the below linked article to show that microbes to man evolution is a faith, not a science.
Science tells us that mutations degrade and destroy genetic information and programming and that they have never created any new genetic information.
However, the researcher in this article is claiming that a certain bacteria evolved a new gene when she states, "We now know what genes were gained by enterococci hundreds of millions of years ago, when they became resistant to drying out, and to disinfectants and antibiotics that attack their cell walls".
There is absolutely no scientific evidence to support the claim that new genes can be created by mutations. In fact, this goes against what scientific observations tells us. This researcher's religion is on full display. She saw that a bacteria had a certain gene and, based on her faith, she assumed that it was created by microbes to man evolution. This is an irrational conclusion based on the observable facts.