The below article shows something fascinating. The mechanism that controls vernalisation, or "how plants sense periods of low temperature, and 'remember' this information in order to control the timing of flowering. It ensures plants avoid flowering during the destructive winter months, and instead flower during the warm spring and summer months when they have ample time and sunlight to produce seeds".
The article states, "This remarkable process relies on plants 'remembering' how much time has elapsed in low temperature conditions, through the gradual modification of a specific gene found in plant cells". Basically a gene known as FLC controls the flowering, but it is a protein called VAL1 that looks for a specific sequence in the gene and can turn the gene off. But the experiment in the article shows that when that sequence has been mutated or changed, the protein can't find the sequence and so the flower couldn't go into hibernation in the winter.
First this shows that once again mutations are a force of degrading and destroying genetic information, not the force by which genetic information is created.
Second it shows the complexity of life. We have a protein searching for and finding a specific sequence in the gene then it shuts down the gene. What are the odds of this happening through random mutations? This is obviously a designed program feature as any computer programmer can spot.
The article states, "this type of regulation has been evolutionary conserved for the control of flowering". It states this because the same mechanism was found to be present in another type of plant. Whereas Creation would say this is just another common design feature, or to use computer terminology, another function or procedure that executes a certain functionality that can be used in many different programs. We should expect an intelligent designer to reuse coding just as programmers do today. But both of these are faith based views. So what does the observable science show? It shows mutations destroy information, not create it. It shows complex and co-ordinated processes. It shows that life is super complex. The Creation explanation of a super intelligent designer fits the observable evidence far better!
Tour the links in the "More" section of this site to learn more about why evolution is not true and the observable science points towards a perfect original creation by God.
Click the image below to read a scientific article to support this statement.
I'm busy working on my blog posts. Watch this space!