Here is an article that makes sense to the Creationist, but not to the Evolutionist. Researchers found footprints of a supposed less evolved human ancestor - Homo Erectus - this is said to be 1.5 million years old. If you Google images for Homo Erectus you will find an ape like creature straight from the imagination of evolutionists.
The article states, "Our analyses of these footprints provide some of the only direct evidence to support the common assumption that at least one of our fossil relatives at 1.5 million years ago walked in much the same way as we do today".
So, does the observable scientific evidence point to homo erectus being an actual human, who likely had variation as seen today in the diverse people groups, or some sort of hybrid ape man? While conclusions about fossils and footprints are very vulnerable to ones preconceived assumptions - that goes for evolutionists and creationists - it seems the scientific observations point towards the footprint of a human, not an ape-man.
Tour the links in the "More" section of this site to learn more about why evolution is not true and the observable science points towards a perfect original creation by God.
Click the image below to read a scientific article to support this statement.
I'm busy working on my blog posts. Watch this space!