Here we have an article on the evolution of mammals that evolved back into the sea. In other words, a simple life form became a bacteria, became a fish, became a frog, became a lizard, became a land mammal, became a manatee. Doesn't that idea just sound insane! And when you look at observable science it only becomes more insane.
The article states, "For the manatee, walrus, dolphin, and killer whale, the return to the sea involved many evolutionary trade-offs amongst hundreds of genes: a general loss of the number of sensory genes for smell and taste, new functions for genes forming skin and connective tissue, and genes involved in muscle structure and metabolism."
While I agree that gene function can be lost, because mutations destroy things, I love how they just throw in how new genes and functions just arose. No scientific proof whatsoever about how that genetic information was created over time. From skin and tissues, to muscle and metabolism - the changes required to go from land to sea are enormous and would require a ton of new genetic information to be written. Evolution can't explain this so they hope the reader is simply ignorant and will take them at their word.
There is no observable science that shows mutations can create new functional information.
Tour the links in the "More" section of this site to learn more about why evolution is not true and the observable science points towards a perfect original creation by God.
Click the image below to read a scientific article to support this statement.
I'm busy working on my blog posts. Watch this space!